Date: December 22, 1877
Location: Tenant's Harbor, Maine
Victim: Mrs. Sarah Meservey
Cause of Death: Strangulation
Accused: Nathan Hart
In 1877 Tenant’s Harbor, Maine, was a tiny seacoast village consisting of around forty families of fishermen, lobstermen and sailors. They were a sociable group with plenty of community activity to brighten the bitter winter months, but Sarah Meservey kept to herself and did not join them. In fact, some said she preferred it when her husband was away at sea and she lived alone. That is probably why no one seemed to notice when she disappeared from public view for five weeks during that December and January.
Sarah was last seen on December 22, 1877, returning from the post office. A neighbor girl, Clara Wall, walked a few steps with her before Sarah entered her house. It was not until January 29, with the Meservey mail piling up at the post office that community leaders decided to check on Sarah.
Captain Albion Meservey , Luther Meservey’s cousin, went with two other men to Sarah’s house. When they got no answer, they checked the windows and, finding one that was unlatched, they entered the house that way. They found the rooms in disarray; furniture overturned, drawers ransacked, mirrors broken. In a spare room on the first floor they found the body of Sarah Meservey wrapped in a blanket. She had been strangled by her own scarf—a white woolen scarf commonly called a “cloud”—wound tightly around her neck and knotted. Her wrists had been bound behind her head with fisherman’s cod line. She was fully clothed and still wearing her overcoat and rubbers, indicating that killer attacked her soon after she entered the house.
Monday ev'n'g 24.
i came as a Womn She was out and I
(illegible) till she Came back, not
For Money but I killed her
At first the people of Tenant’s Harbor did not believe that one of their community was a murderer. They thought the killer had come from the sea as had happened five years earlier on Smuttynose Island, further down the Maine coast, where two women were brutally murdered by a man who came to the island by rowboat. But those who entered the house could tell that this killer knew the layout and was searching for something. Spent matches on the floor indicated that he was searching by match light. Though he did not find all of her money, motive was surely robbery and the killer was someone from the village.
On February 19, Mrs. Levi Hart received the following letter:
Feb. 10, 1878
To Mrs Livi Hart
i thought i would drop you A line to tell you to tell your husband to be careful how he conducted things about Tenants Harbor cause if he dont he and a good many others of the men will get An ounce ball put threw him for tell them that it is no use trying to catch this chap for he will not be caught—so be careful who you take up in at st George you shall hear from me again in three months
The letter to Mrs. Hart was dated February 10, but postmarked from Philadelphia on February 16. That, together with the condition of the enveloped led to the belief that the letter had been sent to Philadelphia in another envelope and remailed from there.
Levi Hart and Nathan F. Hart were early suspects in the murder because both men were neighbors of the Meserveys and both were seen at the house after the body was discovered. Captain Albion Meservey was married to Nathan Hart’s sister Irene, and suspicion against Nathan Hart began with a simple statement by Meservey to Deacon Long:
“I have been talking with Irene this morning; what if it was Nathan who done it?”
In May 1878, with Nathan Hart still in prison, another letter came to Tenant’s harbor. This one was postmarked Providence, Rhode Island, and was addressed to Mrs. Mahala Sweetland. The letter was long and rambling; in several thousand words the killer explained that, a long time ago, he had gone with Sarah Merservey, had gotten fresh with her and received a slap in the face. He returned the night of the murder to see if she had told anybody. He had planned to rob her and burn the house down. The letter told in detail how he fought with Sarah then strangled her with the scarf. He left the house with $1,100.
The Sheriff first believed that this letter had been written by someone else, but Alvin Dunton concluded that it had been written in the same hand as the other two. It was then believed that Hart had written the letter in jail and given it to his wife to mail. He was allowed no more visits with his wife and the fact that no more letters arrived was considered proof that he had been the writer.
Nathan Hart was indicted by the Grand Jury on the strength of the circumstantial evidence—particularly Dunton’s handwriting analysis. At the time of the indictment neither Hart nor his wife could say for certain where Nathan Hart was the evening of December 22, when the murder was committed, or December 24, when the first note was left in the murder house.
At trial in October however, Hart, his wife, and his stepdaughter all testified that they were positive Nathan Hart had been home the night of December 22. On December 24 he was visiting his granddaughter. But the most important witness to change his testimony was Alvin Dunton. He now believed that he had been deliberately deceived when Albion Meservey gave him the ship’s log. The log had been written by two different people and, although the first part of the log matched the notes and letter, the second did not. He now believed the sample he was given was not written by Hart. Moreover, neither the notes nor the log matched more recent samples of Nathan Hart’s handwriting. Dunton became convinced that Hart did not write the notes and at the trial testified for the defense.
In his closing arguments, County Attorney Lindley M. Staples, stressed the discrepancies in the Harts’ testimony. He maintained that Nathan Hart was the only man in the county with the character, disposition, opportunity, courage and requisite knowledge to have done the deed.
The trial lasted six days. The jury deliberated for ninety minutes before returning a verdict of guilty.
Verdict: Guilty of first degree murder.
Nathan Hart was sentenced to life in prison (Maine had abolished capital punishment after the hanging of Louis Wagner for the Smuttynose murders. It would later be reinstated and abolished once more.)
Hart’s attorney, J. H. Montgomery, had said in his closing arguments that, should Hart be sentenced to prison, he would make it his life’s work to free him. However, no attempt was made to appeal the case.
Alvin Dunton was so distressed over his role in convicting a man that he now believed innocent, that in 1882 he wrote a book, The True Story of the Hart-Meservey Murder Trial, describing how Nathan Hart had been railroaded. The book’s subtitle is a good summary of its nature: In Which Light is Thrown Upon Dark Deeds, Incompetency, and Perfidy; and Crime Fastened Upon Those Whose Position, If Not Manhood, Should have Commanded Honest Dealing. In the book he not only attempted to prove Hart’s innocence but in no uncertain terms, accused Captain Albion Meservey of murdering Sarah Meservey, writing the notes and deceiving Dunton.
The book also indicted nearly everyone involved in the trial: Sheriff Low, County Attorney Staples, Hart’s attorney, J. H. Montgomery, and even fourteen-year-old Cara Wall who had testified to seeing Sarah Meservey the day she was murdered. Cara could not be trusted, he said, because she had later been accused of trying to poison a rival for her boyfriend’s affections. Those mentioned in the book bought as many copies as they could, attempting to keep it out of circulation in Tenant’s Harbor. Captain Albion Meservey sued Dunton for libel, seeking $20,000 damages. He was awarded $1,855, but could not collect because Professor Dunton had moved to Boston. Dunton continued to accuse Meservey of murder, Meservey sued again and was awarded $1,686.78, but never collected that amount either.
Nathan Hart died in prison of “malignant jaundice,” five years after being sentenced. Legend in Tenant’s Harbor says that Hart actually died from eating a poisoned cake that a woman had brought to him in prison.
More than fifty years later, Hart’s attorney, J. H. Montgomery decided to reveal the “facts” in the case. He said that Nathan Hart had actually murdered Mrs. Meservey. He never intended to kill her, just to choke her into submission. Hardly anyone in Tenant’s Harbor believed this story.
Most commentators today believe that Nathan Hart was guilty, but the belief is not universal. It will never be known exactly what happened on that day in 1877 and the Hart-Meservey murder remains “Maine’s most unusual unsolved murder case.”
|This is one of 50 stories featured
in the new book
The Bloody Century