Saturday, April 26, 2025

Views of the Fisk Assassination.

James Fisk Jr. was a robber baron, stock manipulator, and financial fraudster. In spite of this, he was a popular, much-loved public figure. On January 6, 1872, he was assassinated on the staircase of the Grand Central Hotel in New York City by his friend and sometime business partner, Edward “Ned” Stokes. Fisk and Stokes were both in love with Josie Mansfield, considered by some to be the most beautiful woman in America. 

The murder became a national sensation and was graphically illustrated many times in magazines and books.

Read the full story here: Jubilee Jim.
 
1. Life, Adventures, Strange Career and Assassination of Col. James Fisk Jr. (Philadelphia: Barclay and Co, 1872.)
2. Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper, January 20, 1872.
3. The Life of James Fisk Jr. (Philadelphia: Union Publishing Company, 1872.)
4. “The Stokes-Fisk Assassination,” Illustrated Police News, January 11, 1872.

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Liquor and Free Love.

As Police Officers Henry Johnson and Eli Veazie were leaving the Chelsea, Massachusetts City Marshal’s office on the evening of February 17, 1872, they were approached by a man, intoxicated and in a state of agitation.

“I have had my revenge. I want you to go with me,” he said, “I suppose I have killed him and shall have to suffer for it.”

The man, Arzo B. Bartholomew, led them to a men’s furnishings store on Pearl Street, where a crowd had gathered in front of the building. Officer Johnson went upstairs to an apartment on the second floor and found the body of Charles Storer lying face down inside the doorway, stabbed through the heart.

The police were well aware of the animosity between Bartholomew and Storer, but did not take it seriously. Storer was 45 years old, Bartholomew was 61, and both were in love with the same woman.

The three-room apartment was occupied by Dr. Sydney B. West and Mrs. Susan D. Gilbert. The third room they used to manufacture a patent medicine called Dr. West’s Medicated Candy. Dr. West had formerly practiced medicine in Boston and had moved to Chelsea about a year earlier to produce his medicated candy in partnership with Mrs. Gilbert. A few months later, Charles Storer, a well-known builder in Chelsea, joined the firm.

Susan Gilbert was about 40 years old. She was tall and slim with a fair complexion. According to the New York Herald, “She may have been very comely in youth and is not by any means repulsive in appearance now.” She and Dr. West shared an apartment, but they maintained that their relationship was a business partnership, not romantic. The same could not be said of Susan and Charles Storer, who developed a “mutual admiration.” Although he had a wife and four daughters, Storer’s attachment to Susan Gilbert grew much warmer, and he spent much of his time at her apartment.

Arzo Bartholomew lived a sorrowful life. His wife died two years earlier from a fall down the stairs in their South Boston apartment. He had recently been swindled in a property deal, and his furniture was stolen. As a young man, he was a police officer but was dismissed for cowardice. He went with another officer to quell a disturbance, got frightened, and left his partner to go it alone.

Bartholomew met Suson Gilbert in the spring of 1871 at a Spiritualist meeting in Boston. He probably wanted to communicate with his dead wife, whom he referred to as the “dear departed.” At the meeting, he and Susan formed a strong attachment that, for Bartholomew, grew into an absolute infatuation. They met again at a Spiritualist camp meeting in Concord, Massachusetts. Charles Storer was also at the camp meeting, and the two men had a lively quarrel, which Susan pacified to prevent injury.

In the 1870s, many Spiritualists also advocated free love, prompting the New York Herald to headline their story, “Free Love and Murder.”  The Congregationalist declared, “Liquor and free love doctrines have to answer for this crime.”

Back in Chelsea, Bartholomew visited Susan often. He claimed that he and Susan were engaged to be married; an assertion that she would neither confirm nor deny. Storer did everything he could to keep Batholomew away. He would sit on the steps in front of the apartment to prevent Bartholomew’s visits. Sometimes he would stay as late as 2:00 AM, and more than once the police chased him home. Bartholomew entered a complaint with the City Marshal, saying that Storer had threatened to shoot him if he did not stay away from Susan. The officers, aware of the situation, advised him to stay away.

On the day of the murder, Bartholomew arrived at the apartment heavily intoxicated. Seeing his condition, Susan did not want to talk to him. He persisted, saying he wanted an interest in the medicated candy business or employment with the firm. She told him he had to go.

Bartholomew said he would end all trouble, then he took something from his pocket and made a motion as if stabbing himself. He struck Susan in the breast with his fist or the handle of a knife. Dr. West interfered, and Bartholomew pushed him away violently. Knowing Storer would be there soon, Susan tried again to persuade him to leave.

In the midst of the confusion, Storer arrived and said, “I have got something to say about this.”

Bartholomew turned his attention to Storer, and the men immediately clinched. Storer threw Bartholomew to the floor, and Susan begged him not to hurt Bartholomew as he was drunk. Storer got up and said he was going for the police. Bartholomew rose and followed him out the door. Susan and Dr. West went after them and stumbled over the body of Storer on the entry floor. They moved him inside. He was apparently unconscious; they saw no blood.

After two or three minutes, he sat up and exclaimed twice, “What’s the matter?”

He sank down, then up again, saying, “What’s the matter?”

His eyes became fixed and glassy, and he fell dead. They saw the fatal wounds, two downward gashes in the left breast, one of which penetrated the heart.

News of the murder travelled quickly through Chelsea. Charles Storer’s eldest daughter pushed her way through the crowd that had gathered outside the building. When she saw her murdered father, she threw her arms around his neck and cried bitterly, unable to accept that he was dead.  The Boston Morning Journal said, “Her grief was so poignant and so demonstrative that it touched the hearts and moistened the eyes of the few spectators present.”

The police arrested Dr. West and Susan Gilbert as witnesses and took them to the jail where Bartholomew was already in custody. They were held on $5,000 bail to make sure they would be available to testify.

Bartholomew said that Storer had dogged him for weeks. As he was talking with Susan, Storer came in and called him an “extremely hard name” then grabbed him by the collar and threw him on the floor. He could not remember anything after that. On the advice of his counsel, Bartholomew did not testify at his arraignment, where he was indicted for manslaughter.

At his trial the following March, the prosecution entered into evidence a letter from Bartholomew to Susan showing the extent of his infatuation (as well as his inability to spell):

Boston, January 14, 1872
Dearest darling Susie, my sweete angil, I could not goe to bed with out writing you a few lines dareling Susie, you are my dareling sweete bird. I was sorry that I could not staid with you longer to day dareling, but we will be together more soon I hope sweete dareling. God in heaven and the angils will bless ours dareling  dout not enny more sweete susie, my loved one you are all the hopes that I have in the world  Susie dareling you alone make me happy. why should I not ask your hand and heart to be mine dareling presious sweete one? say yes dareling God bless your soul   a thousand kisses for you.

I shall be there about half past 9 o’clock wensdsay night if nothing happens   my cold is very bad  I am all stuft upt to-night   this is from your true lover dareling A. B. Bartholemew  good buy dareling angil birde

The jury found Bartholomew guilty of manslaughter. After a failed appeal, the judge sentenced him to six years in the State Prison.

In 1876, after serving three and a half years of his sentence, Azro Bartholomew was pardoned.


Sources: 
“Affecting Scene and Poignant Grief ,” Illustrated Police News, February 29, 1872.
“Brieflets,” Boston Evening Transcript., June 20, 1876.
“Chelsea,” Boston Daily Journal, February 20, 1872.
“The Chelsea Homicide,” Boston Daily Evening Transcript., March 21, 1872.
“The Chelsea Tragedy,” BOSTON HERALD., February 19, 1872.
“The Chelsea Tragedy,” BOSTON HERALD., February 20, 1872.
“The Chelsra Tragedy,” Boston Daily Journal, March 22, 1872.
“Crimes and Criminals,” CONGREGATIONALIST., February 22, 1872.
“Free Love and Murder,” New York Herald, February 19, 1872.
“New-England News-Summary,” Boston Cultivator., March 30, 1872.
“Sad Tragedy in Chelsea,” Boston Morning Journal., February 19, 1872.
“Sentenced for Manslaughter,” Boston Evening Journal, December 9, 1872.

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Parting from Her Doomed Lover.

National Police Gazette, December 29, 1888.

Franklin Asbury Hawkins murdered his mother on October 29, 1887, and dumped her body, beaten and shot, by the side of the road in Islip, Long Island. 22-year-old Hawkins was angered that his mother objected to his desire to marry Hattie Schrecht, a servant girl. Hawkins was easily convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to be hanged in December 1888.

Hattie Schrecht visited Hawkins in his jail cell the night before his execution. She blamed herself for the murder, but the weeping girl assured her doomed lover that they would meet again in heaven.

Read the full story here: The Hawkins Matricide

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Shot Down in Court.

Police Officers Farson and Conway were patrolling the neighborhood of Orleans and Washinton Streets in Memphis, Tennessee, on the night of April 28, 1890, when they heard a cry of,” Help! Murder!” They hurried to the source and opened the door to find a woman lying on the floor with a heavy-set man over her with a death grip on her throat. They arrested the man and took him to Central Station, where they learned that they had captured Jake Ackerman, one of the most successful and dangerous criminals in the country.

Jake Ackerman, alias Soloman S. Markes, was a burglar, sneak thief, and “all-around crook,” remarkably adept at evading capture. He was also known as “Natural Jake” for his ability to feign innocence when arrested and avoid prison when convicted.

Ackerman had been a criminal since his childhood in Memphis when he was the leader of a gang of young thieves known as the Mackerl Brigade. Several robberies were traced to the gang, but the police were unable to secure evidence to convict the culprits. Between the ages of 13 and 17, Ackerman was arrested at least 50 times.

In 1883, Ackerman and an accomplice robbed a drunken man of $600. When arrested, Ackerman thrust something into his mouth. The police officer grabbed his throat and choked him until he coughed it up. It was a $500 bill. The victim, a Mississippi planter visiting Memphis, was so happy to get his money back that he tipped the officer $100 but did not press charges. When the case went to trial, Ackerman was acquitted due to his youth, and on the condition that he leave the city.

In the years that followed, Ackerman committed crimes throughout the country. He was married in Indiana, and they moved to Topeka, Kansas. From there, he went to Des Moines, Iowa, where he was arrested for robbing a jewelry store.  His father-in-law put up $1,000 bail to release him from jail, but Ackerman did not stay for his trial. He skipped to Jacksonville, Florida, and his wife divorced him. 

He was arrested in Canton, Mississippi, for assaulting and attempting to rob a man on a train. He was convicted and taken by train to the penitentiary in Jackson, Mississippi. En route, Ackerman made a daring escape. Although handcuffed, he jumped through the window of the moving train and fled. He was arrested several more times and at least twice escaped by putting soap in his mouth and feigning an epileptic fit, then easily breaking out of the hospital.

In 1888, Ackerman met Lizzie Broderick in Missouri. The well-dressed, fast-talking Ackerman charmed the innocent young girl. Her parents were against Ackerman because he was Jewish, and they forbade her from seeing him. But Lizzie was infatuated and left her home to travel with Ackerman to Fort Scott, Kansas, where they were married.

But, Ackerman did not change his ways. 

Lizzie Ackerman
“Our married life has been a very trying one,” said Lizzie. “Jake would be with me one day and in some jail or penitentiary the next. With repeated promises made on bended knees to reform and live an honest life, I stood by Jake in all his troubles.”

During one prolonged absence, she moved to Memphis and changed her name to avoid the stigma associated with “Ackerman.” He tracked her down in Memphis, and they had a pleasant reunion until he found some letters implying that she had cheated on him. This led to the altercation, interrupted by the Memphis police officers.

Jake Ackerman was charged with assault and attempted murder and was arraigned in Police Court on April 30, 1890. In court, he handed Lizzie a note:

Lizzie: I hope you will send me my shirt; you have got three, and my collars and cuffs and also my knife. Put them in a big valise, also my socks and handkerchiefs so I can take them with me; send my check too.

J.N. Ackerman

This was the last straw for Lizzie. When the case was called and they both stood before the bench, Lizzie pulled a revolver from beneath her cloak and fired three shots.

Pandemonium broke out in the courtroom. The police took Lizzie into custody and carried Ackerman to an adjoining room. Everyone else in the room ran for cover.

“My God! Lay me down,” said Ackerman as someone removed his coat, “I am terribly shot. I can feel myself bleeding inside.”

Ackerman continued to talk as he lay dying. He asked God to forgive him and requested that the $35 in his pocket be given to the poor, but he had no kind words for Lizzie. He wanted to make sure the incriminating letters were introduced at her trial to show how badly she treated him. He died about an hour later.

Lizzie was cool and calm in custody. She explained to a reporter why she killed Ackerman. After he handed her the note, he leaned over and whispered, “There ain’t much of a case against me. I will be out of this without any trouble, and as soon as I get out, so help me God, I’ll kill you.”

“I did not wait for more,” said Lizzie, “but pulled my pistol and fired the shots straight at him…I have been abused all my married life, and I have lived in daily fear of my life for seven years.”

Lizzie was tried in June and found guilty of second-degree murder. She was sentenced to ten years in the penitentiary. 

Public opinion was always on Lizzie’s side, and many believed she did the world a favor by killing Jake Ackerman. Her cause was taken up by the Women’s Christian Association, who won her an absolute pardon from Governor Taylor. She served less than six months of her ten-year sentence.


Sources: 
“'Natural Jake',” Jasper weekly courier., May 9, 1890.
“He Called her Pet Names,” Public Ledger, April 29, 1890.
“Killed Her Husband in Court,” New York Herald, May 1, 1890.
“Killed in Court,” Public Ledger, April 30, 1890.
“Lizzie Ackerman Free,” Memphis Daily Commercial, January 17, 1891.
“Lizzie Ackerman's Victim,” Memphis Avalanche, May 2, 1890.
“A Long Career of Crime,” Memphis Daily Commercial, April 30, 1890.
“A Noted Criminal Caught,” Memphis Avalanche, April 30, 1890.
“Shot Down in Court,” National Police Gazette, May 17, 1890.
“Tragic,” Memphis Daily Commercial, May 1, 1890.
“A Verdict of Ten Years,” Memphis Avalanche, June 20, 1890.
“A Wife Kills Her Husband,” Alexandria gazette., May 1, 1890.